How to choose between fluent and react native


The protracted debate between cross platform programmers about react native and fluent is becoming more and more intense. In previous years, react native was still the preferred framework for developers, but since the release of fluent in 2017, it has developed into a strong competitor of react native.

Recently, with many start-ups choosing flutter for MVP development, react native is facing fierce competition from flutter. So the question is, which application development technology will be successful in 2022?

Advantages of flutter application

  1. Hot overload = fast coding

Fluent allows developers to create applications in a more complex and faster way. This is one of the biggest advantages of flutter, which is also valued by all top mobile application development companies.

Developers can make improvements to the code base in real time and immediately see these improvements reflected in the request. This is the so-called “hot overload” feature, and changes usually take only a few milliseconds to display.

This feature allows teams to quickly add features, fix bugs, and test new ideas.Front end trainingIn addition, when teams need to work together to speed up development, hot overloading is very easy to use.

  1. Single code base for multiple mobile platforms

Fluent allows developers to write only one code base for two applications – one for IOS and the other for Android. Because flutter has its own template and layout, its operating system independent platform means that developers can use the same functions on two different systems, while maintaining each application has its own unique style, availability and functions.

Fluent for web is developed by Google, which provides developers with the necessary reputation guarantee. Once the application goes online, it can support Android, IOS and web platforms with a single code base.

  1. Compared with react native, only half of the tests are required

Since you will test the same program on both platforms, the quality assurance process will be much faster. We have written only half of the automated tests, because the same tests can be written on both platforms, which minimizes the workload of the quality inspection team.

However, since your quality inspection expert must manually check the applications on each device, you need to carry out manual testing at a similar level to native programming.

Why do people like native rather than native?

  1. Fast refresh = fast encoding

It has the same characteristics as the flutter. Hot overloading speeds up the development process and allows programmers to insert new code directly into running applications. This allows developers to see improvements immediately without having to rebuild the application.

Hot reloading preserves the state of the application and avoids the risk of losing it during a full reload (a big advantage in the case of a state based framework) – which further accelerates the growth of mobile applications.

  1. One codebase, two mobile platforms (or more!)

Just like flutter, you only need to write a code base to run two applications, one on Android and one on IOS.Xi’an front end trainingEven better, because you use JavaScript, you can share code with web applications when developing cross platform applications. You only need to use abstract modules that can be compiled for a specific platform.

See the following examples for libraries that allow you to program on IOS and Android and other systems, including web and desktop applications, at the same time:

React native for web is a cross platform application that supports Android, IOS and web (twitter uses it to create twitter Lite).

Reactxp – an application developed by Skype, which supports Android, IOS, Internet and windows 10 (uwp).

The Microsoft team created react native windows for all windows 10 users (PCs, tablets, two in one, Xbox, hybrid reality devices, etc.).

React native programmers view things and take actions different from most people.

You can assume that web desktop applications, mobile web applications and native applications all have the same business logic, but they need different UIs to meet different user needs.

  1. It uses the popular programming language – JavaScript

React native uses JavaScript, a common programming language, and dart is not yet known. If you are a developer who likes statistics, you can also use typescript (a superset of JavaScript).

  1. Freedom of choice for developers

Developers can use react native to develop cross platform applications.

The advantage is that react native allows you to accurately select the solution to be used according to the project requirements and the preferences of developers.

For example, if developers need to deal with the global state (how to store and manage the data used by multiple components in a single application), they can use the custom user interface library or write their own user interface library; They can use the library router, or choose between JavaScript and typescript.

Things to consider before choosing a framework

For many people, fluent is more difficult to learn than react native. React native is popular among developers because it uses the famous programming language JavaScript. Therefore, if you are a novice of dart, it may take you longer to learn fluent than to learn react native. But vice versa: if you’ve used dart before, it’s easy to learn fluent.

Because the components in react native are very simple, you have to pay a lot of work when setting their styles. Only a few modules can recognize the platform, and almost all need to apply different features or set different styles for IOS and Android.

On the other hand, fluent treats components as widgets. In addition, these widgets are based on material design, so they can be highly customized. Most widgets are adaptive, which means they can be used on both Android and IOS.

Flutter has performance advantages because it can be compiled into arm or x86 native resources, so it is very fast.

React native is only the packaging of native methods, that is, it builds a bridge to convert some calls into native APIs; This becomes a bottleneck when there are many native calls.

React native does not convert to native code. It also has a JavaScript layer, and the performance of rendering these codes is lower than that of fluent. There are some solutions, but flutter doesn’t have to worry about them because the view layer is as simple as a game – and because flutter engineers build all the components, there are fewer native calls to the bridge because they are just a wrapper for the native view.

Using react native components will not get enough customization capabilities. Therefore, if someone chooses not to wrap a process, it cannot be used (for example, the dotted box around the view will not work) – and new components from Google and Apple will take a long time to appear in react native.

The bug fix of react also began to take longer. For example, the problem of boundary rupture, and the problem of supporting different flavors, and so on. Most react native companies are making custom bifurcations to fix upstream unpatched bugs. Flutter developers are more cautious and repair is often fast. In the end, you may spend most of your time in react native documents, looking for various problems and trying to find out why things didn’t go as expected.


We hope the information in this article can help you determine the answer to the following question: “fluent or react native, which is better?” In terms of general consensus, Google’s fluent will continue to exist as an SDK and may replace react native in the next few years. If technology becomes more important in the future, it is very important to keep up with the trend while selecting the best solution.