Class stratification of interview


Yesterday’s interview was divided into speech and question answering. I already said the speech, so I won’t mention it much. Not Versailles. I’m professional and my performance is really good. I was born with the second prize in the provincial speech contest. If I can’t speak well, I’ll be ashamed!

The answer is meaningful. If leaders want you to succeed, they will directly ask you about your daily work, so I recited a lot of questions about Party construction, publicity and personnel. As a result

It was a leader in charge of development (not on my line at all) who asked me. “One of your colleagues answered a certain project just now. Please continue this topic and go on.”

I’m stupid. Which colleague? What did he answer? What project? I’m not responsible at all, and if I’m not responsible, it’s impossible for me to inquire about other people’s work in private. Moreover, asking about the progress of a very professional project is purely to dig a hole for me. He has my resume in his hand and knows my position. To put it bluntly, it is difficult!

Finally, the top leader came forward to help me out. Maybe he knew that it was too difficult for others. Another question, my answer was very subtle, because I accidentally knew the focus of the top leader’s attention recently. I answered, and the top leader’s eyes were shining. However, other leaders didn’t understand this information because of their insufficient level, so they looked confused and forced “what is she talking about?”

I know in my heart, you see, the gun hit the head bird, just because I can kill other opponents in my speech. For fear of accidents, I just gave me such a play. I can’t answer the first question, and points will be deducted even if the second answer is better.

Because I didn’t announce my scores on the spot, I could hear the scores of about 20 players and laugh off my big teeth before I went on the stage. The players from municipal government departments, no matter how they play, all score more than 93 points. The problem is also very simple. What is your daily work?

Small grass-roots leaders, with scores ranging from 85 to 90, ask how to care about grass-roots employees, how to be people-oriented, and how to mobilize the work enthusiasm of old employees.

Other people who have no relationship with their background are all 80 to 85 points, including two Chinese departments, clapping praises written by manuscripts, two hosts, good field control effect, and two speakers. The questions asked were very professional and difficult to answer.

I thought there were 50 judges at first, but later I learned that there were 70… After 12 hours of interview, do you say you are tired? Hundreds of runners work so hard. Why? Just specify who you want to say no.

For those with higher scores, a from the supervision department, B from the office, C from the development department, D from the organization department and E from the personnel department, I just want to ask. You can simply decide directly within the municipal organs.

After the interview, three middle-level leaders sent me a private letter saying that I was doing well. Don’t get excited. It doesn’t mean that I was selected. What should I say? It’s still that sentence. I’m the person who accompanies the prince to study, or the best one. You know, not everyone can accompany the prince to study. However, I’ve been accompanying the prince for N years, and several princes have changed, I am still the best companion reader.

Another remark, you product, you fine product, someone asked, “why did you give all the high scores to the municipal authorities?” Someone answered, “people have natural advantages, but they are influenced differently under the feet of the emperor. Their ideological consciousness is higher than those at the grass-roots level, and their status is there.”